Central School District 13J — OR

Bond: $90M · GO Bond · Nov 5, 2024 · ~43% Yes / 57% No (simple majority required; defeated) · NCES district 4102840 Stated purpose: Address overcrowding district-wide, replace Monmouth Elementary (citing safety concerns about the building’s old-fashioned design and accessibility) Contacts: Dr. Jennifer Kubista, Superintendent · Brian Weatherly, Facilities Services Manager · (503) 606-2251 · central.k12.or.us Sources: OPB — Oregon Nov 2024 school measures recap · OSBA — voters rejected facility requests · Ballotpedia — Oregon school bond elections

1. Snapshot

Town-Fringe district serving Monmouth and Independence in the mid-Willamette Valley (Polk County) — 3,054 students across 5 schools. SAIPE poverty 12.3% — moderate for the cohort. Demographics are unusually balanced: 48% Hispanic / 44% White / 5% Multiracial — Central 13J has the highest Hispanic share of any district in this six-district set, reflecting the agricultural-corridor demographics of Polk County. Per-pupil expenditure $13,689 — middle-of-pack for Oregon Town-Fringe peers ($13,094–$16,517 range). The district has only 5 schools but is highly compact — all schools cluster within ~3 miles of Independence/Monmouth, making the geographic case for consolidation/renewal genuinely tight.

2. Why this was a hard sell — community context (ACS)

Metric Central 13J National
Median household income $70,397 ~$75K
Median home value $347,800 ~$340K
Bachelor’s+ 26.3%
Graduate degree 8.95%
Owner-occupied 54.7% ~65%
Gini index 0.434
Non-English household 18.6% ~21%
Hispanic % 48%

Two numbers dominate the difficulty: 54.7% owner-occupied (renters outnumber expected) and 48% Hispanic / 18.6% non-English household. Property-tax-funded bonds are a structurally weaker ask in renter-heavy communities — renters don’t see the line item, but the political mechanic of “vote for higher property taxes” doesn’t pull them in. Oregon’s Measures 5 and 50 cap statewide operating mill rates, so capital bonds are how districts modernize — but the bond ask runs through homeowners only, in a district where they’re a thin majority. Pair that with the highest non-English household percentage in this brief set, and campaign messaging reach becomes a real barrier (Spanish-language outreach is mandatory, but the public record doesn’t show evidence of a robust bilingual campaign infrastructure). The 43% Yes is in line with the demographic math, not a special failure.

3. Peer comparison

Top peers identified via MCP (default weights + plantOps emphasis):

Peer district State Enrollment Per-pupil Plant ops/pp Note
Dallas SD 2 OR 2,956 $14,768 $940 Same state, 8 miles north — closest geographic peer (redacted as “Peer District 57328189”)
Molalla River SD 35 OR 2,598 $14,194 $948 Same state, same locale, 36 mi
Peer District 88896592 MI 2,729 $13,094 $901 Likely FMX customer
Big Lake MN 3,190 $16,517 $957 Town-Fringe peer
St Helens SD 502 OR 2,863 $15,652 $970 Same state, 73 mi
Peer District 100A569F MI 3,545 $13,961 Likely FMX customer
Galt Joint Union Elem CA 3,452 $15,122 Town-Fringe, ag-corridor peer
Douglas SD 51-1 SD 2,808 $10,728 $916 Box Elder, similar size
3 redacted “Peer District” entries (MI × 2, IN) Likely FMX customers — outreach team to validate

The peer set leans heavily Oregon (Dallas 8 mi, Molalla 36 mi, St Helens 73 mi, Oregon Trail 58 mi) and includes likely-FMX MI customers — strong cohort for benchmarking.

4. The gap story (what the data would have shown voters)

Central 13J’s data tells a funding-constraint-with-genuine-school-climate-issues story:

The narrative the bond campaign could have used: “50% of our students missed enough school to be flagged chronically absent. We do not have a discipline problem. We have a buildings-and-engagement problem.”

5. Bond history (Ballotpedia + news)

This makes Central 13J a first-attempt failure, not a multi-year trust collapse like Three Rivers. The campaign team has runway to come back with a redesigned, smaller ask — and the demographic case (renter-heavy, Hispanic-majority) is one a bilingual + condition-data-driven campaign could change.

6. What voters / opposition actually said

Direct quotes from Central 13J coverage are thin. The OPB / OSBA framing is the relevant context:

The Monmouth Elementary safety/accessibility framing reportedly didn’t carry — voters “dismissed these safety concerns” per OPB coverage. That’s a campaign message that didn’t translate.

7. What we could have told them

  1. “50% of our students missed 10% or more of the school year. Monmouth Elementary — the building we’re proposing to replace — has the lowest absenteeism of all five schools. New buildings aren’t the answer; this is a portfolio condition story, and the bond is one part of it. Independence Elementary at 53% absent is the actual emergency.” Repositions the bond ask away from Monmouth Elementary (where the data doesn’t support the lead claim) and toward the school where it does.
  2. “$232,000 in capital outlay last year, across 5 schools and 3,054 students. Dallas (8 miles north) spent $1.4M+. We are an order of magnitude behind our nearest peer on capital reinvestment — and that compounds.” Direct same-county peer comparison.
  3. “$875/student on plant operations — the lowest in our Oregon Town-Fringe peer set. We’re not over-spending on buildings; we’re under-spending. The bond closes that gap.” Defuses “you’ve been wasting money” opposition.
  4. 48% of our students are Hispanic. 19% of our households don’t speak English at home. The campaign mailers and ballot title need to reflect that — and the next ask should pair with year-round bilingual community engagement, not a 6-week campaign push. Process recommendation, not a data point — but it’s the demographic math the 43% Yes will not change without.
  5. “Talmadge Middle School expels zero students per year but suspends 24%. Class-by-class data on classroom condition + per-room climate readings would show whether the building is part of the suspension pattern. That’s a story we can put on a mailer.” School-specific, addresses both safety/climate and condition.

8. FMX outreach hook

Central 13J is a moderate-priority, longer-runway prospect. They’re a first-time bond failure in a district with real funding constraints and a demographic profile that requires structural campaign redesign, not just messaging tweaks. The natural angle is the next attempt 18–24 months out, paired with year-round community engagement infrastructure. Lead with peer benchmarking against Dallas SD 2 (the 8-mile-away same-state peer) and the likely-FMX MI/IN peers in the top 10.

Best contact angle: Brian Weatherly (Facilities Services Manager) as the operations entry point — but the conversation needs to escalate to Dr. Jennifer Kubista (Superintendent) since the demographic-driven campaign redesign is a strategy-level call, not a facilities call. Opener: “Dallas SD 2 — 8 miles north, same state, same locale, near-identical enrollment — spends about 8% more per student total but 7% more on plant ops. Your district’s chronic absenteeism is the highest in this Oregon Town-Fringe peer group; that’s the story your next bond campaign needs to tell with per-building data. We can give you a side-by-side with Dallas, Molalla, and the redacted MI/IN peers in your top 10 before you re-design the ask.” Smaller ask (probably $40–60M) targeted at a single school + portfolio renewal, paired with bilingual outreach, is the playbook the data suggests.