Vermilion Local Schools — OH

Bond: $47M · 4.08-mill bond, 30-year · Nov 4, 2025 · Failed (2nd attempt — May 2025 also failed) · NCES district 3904682 Stated purpose: Construction, renovation, building improvements Contacts: Wes Weaver, Interim Superintendent · Justin Klingshirn, Treasurer/CFO · James Williamson, Director of Operations · (440) 204-1700 · vermilionschools.org Sources: Ideastream coverage · Vermilion Daily — report card story · Ballotpedia – Vermilion LSD

1. Snapshot

Suburb-Midsize district on Lake Erie spanning the Erie/Lorain county line. 1,602 students across 3 traditional schools (Vermilion HS, Sailorway MS, Vermilion ES) plus a digital academy. SAIPE poverty 10.9%. Demographics 88% White / 6% Hispanic / 6% Multiracial — homogeneous. Per-pupil expenditure $14,986 (FY2020).

2. Why this was a hard sell — community context (ACS)

Metric Vermilion Note
Median household income $69,905 Modest
Median home value $168,300 Below state median
Bachelor’s+ 27.6% Notably low for a Suburb-Midsize
Owner-occupied 76.4% High
Gini index 0.504 Moderate inequality
Non-English household 2.8% Effectively English-monolingual community

This is a high-homeowner, lower-college-attainment community with a sub-$170K median home value. A 4.08-mill, 30-year bond on a $168K home runs ~$240/year — not large in absolute terms, but for 30 years on a tax base of ~6,000 households. Bond opposition in Ohio communities like this routinely cites “fixed-income seniors” — a demographic that maps tightly to “owner-occupied, modest home value, low college attainment.”

3. Peer comparison

Top peers identified via MCP (default weights + plantOps emphasis):

Peer district State Enrollment Per-pupil Plant ops/pp Note
South Point Local OH 1,343 $14,970 $1,206 Same state, same locale, very close peer
Sparta Area Schools MI 2,371 $19,381 $1,038 Town-Fringe peer
Yarmouth Schools ME 1,655 $18,801 $1,162 Affluent comparison
Pelham School District NH 1,611 $17,397 $1,304 Higher plant ops investment
Robinson CUSD 2 IL 1,537 $15,163 $1,141 Similar size & spending
3 redacted “Peer District” entries (MI, OH, PA) Likely FMX customers

4. The gap story (what the data would have shown voters)

Vermilion is close to the national median on facilities investment — but its educational outcomes are slipping, and the bond never tied the two together.

5. Bond history (Ballotpedia + news)

District is in a same-cycle, same-ask repeat-fail pattern. Same dollar amount, same purpose, twice in 6 months. Vote margin for May 2025 not reported in available coverage — would be a useful data point for outreach.

6. What voters / opposition actually said

Available coverage is thin — Ideastream lumped Vermilion into a paragraph about northeast-Ohio levy failures; Vermilion Daily focused on the report-card slip. No direct voter or opposition quotes surfaced. The absence of public debate is itself a finding: the district has not generated engagement — neither support nor visible opposition. Two failed asks with no public conversation suggests a campaign-communications void, not a contested community.

7. What we could have told them

  1. “We spent $0 on capital construction in our most recent fully-reported year. The bond is what stops that from being the new normal.” Single most visible data point in the entire district profile.
  2. “South Point Local, a peer Ohio district nearly identical to us, spends $1,206/student on plant operations — we spend $1,168. We’re not behind peers on facilities investment, but we’re not ahead either. The bond is to catch up on capital, not to keep up on operations.” Reframe the ask precisely.
  3. “Our college-and-career-readiness score is 2 stars. The bond renovates the middle school where suspensions are 25% — the grade where the readiness pipeline starts to break. New buildings won’t fix readiness alone, but failing buildings make it worse.” Ties bond to outcome.
  4. At $168K median home × 4.08 mills × 30 years × ~6,000 households = $50.4M nominal collection. Match the ask ($47M) to the collection arithmetic and show voters the math is tight, not padded.
  5. For the next attempt (likely May 2026): scale-down isn’t enough. Re-package as 2–3 ballot items: one for the MS rebuild, one for safety/security at the HS, one for ES capital. Lets voters say yes to part of the ask.

8. FMX outreach hook

Vermilion is a high-fit prospect: small enough that an FMX onboarding could be 90 days, with a CFO/Treasurer (Justin Klingshirn) and a Director of Operations (James Williamson) both named in the spreadsheet — clear two-person decision unit. Lead with Klingshirn: he’s the one who will have to justify the third attempt. Opener: “Two asks in six months, same dollar amount — the data your voters need is per-building condition scores and a 5-year capital plan they can scrutinize. South Point Local across the state already runs that playbook. We can have your facilities portfolio benchmarked against your closest peer (and 4 redacted ones) in 30 days, in time for a re-scoped May 2026 ask.” The OH Suburb-Midsize peer cluster is where the strongest proof points live.