Madison Local Schools (Richland County) — OH

Measure: New 1.5% continuing earned-income tax · ~$6.27M gross ($3.33M net after retiring 2023 property levy) · Nov 4, 2025 · Failed 55.3% No / 44.7% Yes (2,312 vs 1,868) · Second consecutive failure — also failed in earlier 2025 vote, and re-failed in May 2026 at 58% No · NCES district 3904945 Stated purpose: Operating funds — Mifflin Elementary closure already approved, 37.5 FTE eliminated, pay-to-participate athletics reinstated Contacts: Rob Peterson, Superintendent · Bradd Stevens, Treasurer · John Neron, Operations Supervisor · (419) 589-2600 · madisonrams.net Sources: Richland Source — voters reject · Richland Source — Mifflin closure + staff cuts · Richland Source — May 2026 fail · Ideastream Nov 5 coverage

Disambiguation: there are four “Madison Local” districts in Ohio (NCES IDs 3904788 Lake Co., 3904945 Richland Co./Mansfield, 3904612 Butler Co./Middletown, 3904697 Groveport-Madison Franklin Co.). This brief covers 3904945 — Madison Local in Madison Township just east of Mansfield in Richland County, mascot Rams. Cross-reference: NCES madisonrams.net confirms identity.

1. Snapshot

Suburb-Small district immediately east of Mansfield in Richland County, central Ohio. 2,626 students across 6 schools — Madison HS, Madison MS (5-8, 761), Madison South ES (PK-4, 486), Mifflin ES (K-4, 256), Eastview ES (K-4, 218), Madison Early Childhood Learning Center (50). SAIPE poverty 17.3% — high for this list, second only to Elyria and Beloit. Demographics 82% White / 9% Multiracial / 5% Black / 4% Hispanic — much more homogeneous than the Lorain Co. districts. Per-pupil expenditure $16,407 (FY2020) — middle of the cohort.

2. Why this was a hard sell — community context (ACS)

Metric Madison Local Note
Median household income $51,143 Second-lowest in the 7-district set after Elyria
Median home value $118,700 Lowest in the 7-district set
Bachelor’s+ 9.2% The lowest college-attainment community on this list — less than half the state rate
Owner-occupied 68.9% Mid-pack
Gini index 0.390 Low inequality
Non-English household 3.5% Low

This is the lowest-resource community asked to vote on a new tax in this cohort. Median home $119K, median income $51K, only 1-in-11 adults has a bachelor’s degree. A 1.5% earned-income tax on a $51K household = ~$770/year, for life, in a community where the median home is worth $119K. The math is brutal: the annual EIT cost is roughly 0.65% of the median home value, every year. Compared to a property tax levy (one-time hit, sunset, deductible), the EIT structure is the worst possible fit for this voter base. The 55% No / 58% No across two votes reflects that.

3. Peer comparison

Top peers identified via MCP (enrollment 0.18, poverty 0.15, perPupilExp 0.15, locale 0.12, demographics 0.10, staffing 0.10, plantOps 0.20):

Peer district State Enrollment Per-pupil Plant ops/pp Note
Granville Exempted Village OH 2,517 $15,100 $1,047 Top match; same Suburb-Small, 49 mi; redacted in MCP (likely FMX customer)
Bethalto CUSD 8 IL 2,368 $15,637 $1,197 IL suburb, similar profile
Bourbonnais SD 53 IL 2,276 $15,873 $1,124 Chicago exurban peer
Bristol City Public VA 2,167 $14,969 $1,129 Same locale, higher poverty (24%)
Harper Creek Community MI 2,778 $12,403 $1,172 Battle Creek MI peer
Shawnee Local OH 2,239 $12,075 Lima OH same-state Suburb-Small
2 redacted “Peer District” entries (OH, MI) Likely FMX customers — outreach team to validate

4. The gap story (what the data would have shown voters)

5. Levy history

Three consecutive failures with visible cuts between each one — and the cuts didn’t move the needle. The pattern is the opposite of Wickliffe’s: there, between-cycle action moved a winning margin; here, between-cycle action deepened the No vote (55% → 58%).

6. What voters / opposition actually said

Peterson’s quote in Richland Source: “Obviously we’re disappointed. I do want to say that I appreciate all the hard work that our levy committee put in on this and appreciate those who voted to support us.” — gracious but doesn’t probe the voter rationale.

The local context is the explanation: Richland County voters historically reject income taxes for schools at high rates. The Mansfield-area economy has been losing population for two decades (Richland Co. is down ~10% since 2000), aging in place. A 1.5% EIT lands hardest on the working-age cohort, which is the shrinking minority of voters. Retirees and small-business owners dominate the active electorate, and an EIT either hits them in unexpected ways (1099 income) or feels unfair (they don’t pay if they’re not working but want school services for grandchildren).

The Mifflin Elementary closure announcement between the November fail and the May ask was meant to demonstrate seriousness. It didn’t work — and probably hardened opposition by signaling “we’ll close schools to coerce a Yes.”

7. What we could have told them

  1. “Per-student classroom spending: $8,908. Highest of our 5 closest peer districts. We’re not over-spending; we’re spending where it counts.” The peer comparison protects against “cut administrative bloat” rhetoric.
  2. “$1,167 per student on building maintenance vs the national median $1,324. We’re tight — 12% below. But every dollar’s already accounted for. Plant ops isn’t where the money is.” Honest framing — Madison doesn’t have a big under-investment number to lean on. Acknowledging this rebuilds credibility.
  3. “Every one of our six schools has chronic absenteeism over 18%. Madison HS is at 27%. The cuts hit attendance — fewer support staff, more empty seats, less state funding next year. This is a cycle we’re asking voters to help us break.” Concrete and specific.
  4. Switch tax structure for the next ask. Three EIT failures and a closed elementary mean the structure is the issue. A property-tax renewal-plus-increase would land differently in this homeowner-majority community.
  5. The Mifflin closure showed seriousness; it didn’t show necessity. Voters need the after-Mifflin math: “we closed a building and we’re still $2M short. Here’s the per-student cost of staying open with no levy passing.” Without that, the closure reads as leverage, not need.

8. FMX outreach hook

Madison Local is a complicated prospect: they don’t have a big under-investment story to anchor the FMX pitch, they’re now in a building-closure cycle (which makes facilities data more important, not less), and the leadership is fresh out of a third consecutive failed campaign. Contact unit: Rob Peterson (Superintendent), Bradd Stevens (Treasurer), John Neron (Operations Supervisor).

Lead with John Neron — the named operations supervisor at a district that just closed a building and is selling district property has immediate portfolio-management data needs. Bradd Stevens (Treasurer) is the financial-narrative owner for the next ask.

Opener: “You just closed Mifflin and you’re selling the Ashland Road property. Your portfolio is changing fast and the next levy ask — whether income tax or property — needs to lead with ‘here’s exactly what’s left, here’s what it costs to run, here’s how it compares to Granville and four other Suburb-Small Ohio peers.’ We can have your remaining 5-building portfolio benchmarked in 45 days, with per-building condition data and a 5-year capital projection that helps you avoid closing another school. The 2-redacted OH/MI peers in your MCP top 15 are likely already running FMX. The May 2026 result (58% No) means the November ask is going to be the 4th attempt; data is the variable that hasn’t been tried.”

Note: do NOT confuse this district with Madison Local in Lake County (3904788) — same name, similar enrollment, different politics. The mascot (Rams) and madisonrams.net domain are the disambiguators.